If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Please email info@fightingrobots.co.uk if you have any questions.
Itd be OK if people would just make up their blooming minds! When you say shuffler, only two come to mind...Drillzilla and Ansgar. Those are definate shufflers in my mind. Everything else, frankly, isnt.
Its a very technical issue, a concept which you seen to have continual difficulty in understanding
I think the final say in all this rests with the tournament writers, if they say its a shuffler then its a shuffler, their tournament, their rules (to an extent). This is going to come up all the time when walkers are discussed, and i think it would be prudent not to clog up the new improving thread with arguments just yet
Walkers that employ a rotary camshaft to actuate feet will not qualify for the weight advantage (shufflebots). No walker must employ any device other than moveable legs to support its weight. No type of rolling or sliding mechanism will be allowed.
Note it doesnt say the camshafts are the feet (they arent most of the time) but if it uses a rotary camshaft to actuate feet. so no matter how much more elaborate you make the system, rotary camshaft == no walker bonus.
This is also the main reason you dont see many walkers. The weight bonus doesnt justify the complexity of the mechanism. KISS is always better so roboteers will always prefer standard wheels. The double the weight if you make it walk may look enticing but its not really. After all, a rotary camshaft is no more than a wonky wheel.
For RS!!3 I was planning to move up to 128 robots to do an RW7 style tourney, but after a bit of thought I have wondered whether Ill actually I get 16 people, and I have enjoyed doing the RW4 style tourney in Series 2, so I was wondering what you thought was better?
In perspective of tournament scales, I would rather see a smaller 8-16 robot tournament that will get finished quickly, allowing a follow up tournament shortly after. The big thing I dislike about the large tournaments is, they always take ages to be completed and a lot of them dont get finished. The other issue is, by the time they are completed, the version of your robot is about 3 version behind your current one.
I reckon someone punching out 8 or 10 small 8-16 bot tournaments a year is better then someone running a 48-72 bot tournament and taking a year to do it... smaller, frequent tournaments keeps the action high, and the designs current.
Comment