Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Team Coolspeedbot: first feather weight robot

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    I see, well looks like I made everything 0.5mm too big from you guys have said.

    Leave a comment:


  • overkill
    replied
    Like Andy says, clearance around holes is a must. A 0.5mm oversize hole is pretty standard (that's just 0.25mm clearance) for drilled holes and for laser or waterjet cut holes, as much as 0.75. Small waterjetted holes are often not particularly round and I like to clean them up using a Dremel with a tungsten cutter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy
    replied
    To be extra safe I normally make most holes 0.5 bigger than needed on 4mm parts, but for some holes where strength is important I have gone to 0.3 oversize through 10mm thick hardox (higher taper) and they have mostly been ok after a small amount of work with a needle file, for your design id say go 0.4mm or 0.5mm the intended size and it should be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    Originally posted by R9000 View Post
    Yes. It's a huuuuuge pain when you have to enlarge the holes yourself.
    thats why I wanted to be sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • R9000
    replied
    Yes. It's a huuuuuge pain when you have to enlarge the holes yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    After another bit of Maths and some tweaks with the CAD I think I got a bot that should be possible to make. with the bot using 4mm hardox instead of 5mm it can free up weight. Now I have emailed K-cut about cut tolerances and got a response, but I wanted to check with people here.

    Should holes be made lightly bigger then I need them to be and add a millimetre or two around the parts to insure they are not cut too small?

    Screen Shot 2017-05-26 at 18.56.14.png

    Leave a comment:


  • shakesc
    replied
    you wont get 1mm or 2mm hardox
    SSAB did a run of 2mm but that was it, really just beetleweight stuff

    Leave a comment:


  • maddox10
    replied
    The thinnest Hardox 450 I have worked with is 1/8" or 3.2mm.

    I heard about thinner stuff, but never had the pleasure to see it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    Hummm, might look into it but I can only go 1 or 2mm thiner at best.

    Leave a comment:


  • R9000
    replied
    You could always try thinner hardox. 5mm is really quite thick for a featherweight, especially all over. Carbide has 5mm hardox side armour and a 3mm raex base, and that's a heavyweight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    Ok so I did the Maths and looks I might have to use HPDE in select places instead of Hardox. I knew this might have been the case but still a little disappointed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    thanks Rory

    Leave a comment:


  • R9000
    replied
    About 970 kg/m^3, just less than water.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coolspeedbot
    replied
    you wouldn't happen to know the density of HPDE?

    Leave a comment:


  • R9000
    replied
    No worries! Sorry if some of that was elementary to you, I just find it quite useful, especially that last bit, for when you're working with equations you've never used before.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X