Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Design Dilemma

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Design Dilemma

    I am currently stuck between 2 designs... 1 I have been working on for about 8 months but I have discovered has quite a major flaw and another design which is much better but would need another 6 months or so of development before I could even build it...

    Design 1 has gone through about 20 iterations to reach it current stage. It has a 1.8Kg disc, 4 wheel drive and a Shrimech/lifter, however, after a CAD materials mix up, I have hit the weight limit in CAD and still have the welding, ESC's and wiring to take into account. The armour is already thin at 8mm HDPE and the Chassis is looking flimsy with the uprights in 5mm Alu 6061 and the base & struts in 3mm Alu 6061.

    The second design is initiative. The disc is mounted in a pivoting frame so if the robot is flipped the disc mount moves to let the wheels touch the ground and the disc is still driven. However, as with ever design, there are going to be a huge number of problems to solve before it can be built and given it took me over 6 months to bring the other design to a stage I was happy and confident to build it might take the same again for this one.

    From my position I see I have 3 options€¦

    1: Continue with the current design until it all fits in under the weight limit by thinning the armour, chassis, messing around with the internal cut outs and lightening the disc.
    2: Remove the shrimech from the design and go back to a previous version and redevelop the design. This would allow for thicker armour and a stronger chassis but leave the robot with a fundamental flaw, no self righter.
    3:Move to the second design and develop it until I am confident It will work as planned.

    My hope had been to enter one of the competitions after I finish my 2nd year at university, sometime in June. Options 1 & 2 would allow me to do so but with, in my opinion, an inferior design. 3 would mean that I would have to wait until September/October but would mean I would have a better design.

    There is an upside... all the design share the same electronic parts (apart from 1 ESC in option 3) so its only the chassis design changing here!

    Any and all ideas, suggestions, comments and solutions are welcome!!!
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Re: Design Dilemma

    To save weight, would it be possible to run it from 4WD by using 2 motors and running belts between the other 2 wheels?
    Then using something like an XL which hardly weighs anything and save yourself the weight of another ESC too. Also, if you're not using LiPo's you could change over to them and save yourself a load of weight.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Design Dilemma

      You could stick with your first design and add hoops (like on the first drumroll) to make it self right. This would be much lighter than your self righter and cheaper! You could also just use 2 wheel drive rather than 4 wheel drive. I also think I remember reading that you are using 2 speed 900s for the weapon you could reduce this to just one or use a brushless setup.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Design Dilemma

        I think I speak for a lot of people when I say this but...

        GET OFF CAD AND START BUILDING!

        Seriously, you will learn so much more and actually experiencing the problems and working with them, fighting with your robot and meeting others cannot be simulated.

        There are so many little things you'll run into when building that you just can foresee that'll mess up even the best laid plans.

        It's good to have an idea of when you want to make, and a plan to get it in weight, but the knowledge to get that right in theory takes years to accumulate so pick a design and get building.

        If you know for a fact that your first design will be over weight then make some tweaks like what Tony suggests.

        I like the articulating disk idea though. I suggest you have a maximum of 2 teeth of the disk though, otherwise it'll end up 'grinding' against other bots and never get a good bite. You'll also probably want some more weight in it, although Inertia XL's disk is 2kgs (I believe) and that's very effective.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Design Dilemma

          As Pj said get to an event and look around.

          my first robot was useless and I learnt sooo much by going to an event.

          as for weight try only 2wd, use just HDPE/ nylon 6, Lipo's

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Design Dilemma

            There are prob only 2 full combat events for feathers this year in the uk and they are going to be in april so i would build it for then and then improve it for 2013.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Design Dilemma

              Originally posted by Max
              You could stick with your first design and add hoops (like on the first drumroll) to make it self right.
              I wouldn't, they didn't work and have probably shortened Jamie's life considerably with stress. I remember at RL Edinburgh last year he was having flashbacks when there was a Design your own Hoola-hoop desk

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Design Dilemma

                tbf cad is a great tool and if you want to go down the route of machining etc it makes sense, working out the problems etc will be harder but will make things cheaper by using cad

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Design Dilemma

                  Originally posted by Anttazz
                  To save weight, would it be possible to run it from 4WD by using 2 motors and running belts between the other 2 wheels?
                  I have tried belts in the design and I just can€™t seem to make it light enough, but I know it works so I am probably doing something fundamentally wrong.

                  Originally posted by PJ-27
                  It's good to have an idea of when you want to make, and a plan to get it in weight, but the knowledge to get that right in theory takes years to accumulate so pick a design and get building.
                  And its not all CAD I have made 4 prototypes, 2 from card and 2 from laser cut wood, the final one is a functioning robot. The reason it got redesigned, again, was that the motors I chose just were not up to battle. Check this link for a video

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISM3dgcBCyw

                  Originally posted by Anttazz
                  Also, if you're not using LiPo's you could change over to them and save yourself a load of weight.
                  I have steered away from LiPols because of the cost and the possibility of explosions, and the fact I cant have them in my rented flat or in uni (stupid health and safety)

                  When are the 2 full combat events this year? I cant find them on the site€¦ only the heavyweight ones.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Design Dilemma

                    Simple, to make your Robot lighter you need to make it smaller, two motors are sufficient, and then you can almost half the width of your Bot. I am designing my feather at the moment and playing around with the bits. I have built three heavies and you must think compact and small. I remember Ian Lewis shoving his arm and hand into our first Robot, a good lesson learnt

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Design Dilemma

                      Originally posted by Eventorizon
                      Originally posted by Anttazz
                      Also, if you're not using LiPo's you could change over to them and save yourself a load of weight.
                      I have steered away from LiPols because of the cost and the possibility of explosions, and the fact I cant have them in my rented flat or in uni (stupid health and safety)
                      If that's the issue, you may want to look into LiFe/A123 systems batteries if they specifically ban LiPo, they're much more stable and still have decent energy density.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Design Dilemma

                        1) have it run on 2 wheel drive. Scrap the 4 wheel drive option, it will drive better with 2 driven wheels on the same axis as the disc. Gyro forces and all that. Skid plate at the back, job done, around a kilo saved.

                        2) Use lipo. Don't worry about explosions etc, you seem to have your head relatively screwed on so you should be fine. Regarding the rented accomodation.....don't tell them? Keep them hidden, job done.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Design Dilemma

                          i like the video

                          i noticed in its description it says your a product design student just curious as to where you are studying? as i am doing the same course at de mont fort

                          alex

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Design Dilemma

                            I don't think I've ever seen a short hold tenancy agreement that mentions Li-Po's before!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Design Dilemma

                              Lots of good suggestions here. Can't really suggest anything on top of them, but the 2WD suggestion is the best by far. Ewan (Gimson Robotics) built a 4WD vertical spinner years ago but I remember reading on his website/through event reports that he then changed down to two wheels as it made driving easier when competing against the gyroscopic forces generated by the disc. Most of the notable vertical spinners, from Robot Wars through to today, all use 2WD, and for good reason. Also, if you can, keep the wheels as close as possible to the disc's line of rotation. Again this helps to decrease the gyroscopic effects.

                              Regarding lipos, I was hesitant at first as well, partly due to loads of videos of plebs on the web blowing packs up (as well as numerous vids of them going up in flames in American robot fights) but I've heard the following from several experienced people now: lipos are a perfectly safe and usable power source as long as you respect them, their limits and take the appropriate safety precautions with regards to installation and charging/discharging etc.
                              They're also not too expensive these days either (just avoid the extremely cheap crappy packs). Like Gary said, just don't tell the uni/landlords. Much worse stuff goes on in these places. Our halls had a zero tolerance policy towards drugs but I can guarantee you they were kicking about in one room or another.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X