I am currently stuck between 2 designs... 1 I have been working on for about 8 months but I have discovered has quite a major flaw and another design which is much better but would need another 6 months or so of development before I could even build it...
Design 1 has gone through about 20 iterations to reach it current stage. It has a 1.8Kg disc, 4 wheel drive and a Shrimech/lifter, however, after a CAD materials mix up, I have hit the weight limit in CAD and still have the welding, ESC's and wiring to take into account. The armour is already thin at 8mm HDPE and the Chassis is looking flimsy with the uprights in 5mm Alu 6061 and the base & struts in 3mm Alu 6061.
The second design is initiative. The disc is mounted in a pivoting frame so if the robot is flipped the disc mount moves to let the wheels touch the ground and the disc is still driven. However, as with ever design, there are going to be a huge number of problems to solve before it can be built and given it took me over 6 months to bring the other design to a stage I was happy and confident to build it might take the same again for this one.
From my position I see I have 3 options€¦
1: Continue with the current design until it all fits in under the weight limit by thinning the armour, chassis, messing around with the internal cut outs and lightening the disc.
2: Remove the shrimech from the design and go back to a previous version and redevelop the design. This would allow for thicker armour and a stronger chassis but leave the robot with a fundamental flaw, no self righter.
3:Move to the second design and develop it until I am confident It will work as planned.
My hope had been to enter one of the competitions after I finish my 2nd year at university, sometime in June. Options 1 & 2 would allow me to do so but with, in my opinion, an inferior design. 3 would mean that I would have to wait until September/October but would mean I would have a better design.
There is an upside... all the design share the same electronic parts (apart from 1 ESC in option 3) so its only the chassis design changing here!
Any and all ideas, suggestions, comments and solutions are welcome!!!
Design 1 has gone through about 20 iterations to reach it current stage. It has a 1.8Kg disc, 4 wheel drive and a Shrimech/lifter, however, after a CAD materials mix up, I have hit the weight limit in CAD and still have the welding, ESC's and wiring to take into account. The armour is already thin at 8mm HDPE and the Chassis is looking flimsy with the uprights in 5mm Alu 6061 and the base & struts in 3mm Alu 6061.
The second design is initiative. The disc is mounted in a pivoting frame so if the robot is flipped the disc mount moves to let the wheels touch the ground and the disc is still driven. However, as with ever design, there are going to be a huge number of problems to solve before it can be built and given it took me over 6 months to bring the other design to a stage I was happy and confident to build it might take the same again for this one.
From my position I see I have 3 options€¦
1: Continue with the current design until it all fits in under the weight limit by thinning the armour, chassis, messing around with the internal cut outs and lightening the disc.
2: Remove the shrimech from the design and go back to a previous version and redevelop the design. This would allow for thicker armour and a stronger chassis but leave the robot with a fundamental flaw, no self righter.
3:Move to the second design and develop it until I am confident It will work as planned.
My hope had been to enter one of the competitions after I finish my 2nd year at university, sometime in June. Options 1 & 2 would allow me to do so but with, in my opinion, an inferior design. 3 would mean that I would have to wait until September/October but would mean I would have a better design.
There is an upside... all the design share the same electronic parts (apart from 1 ESC in option 3) so its only the chassis design changing here!
Any and all ideas, suggestions, comments and solutions are welcome!!!
Comment