Re: New FW database (new robots)
I'm looking at going to 3 wheel brushless in the future with MBX, but I'll be looking towards a wobbly wheel setup like Y-Pout has. The reason I want to use a mechanical method for the translation is that with the pulse based electrical method of turning the motor off to translate, your reducing the motors duty cycle and degrading the power you get from the motors. I want to run a solution where the motor run at full speed all the time to provide the maximum power and torque. Also, the faster you go with the electronic method, the slower the translation speeds due to the smaller amount of time off time you can produce, the mechanical method should produce close to proportional faster translation as you increase the RPM.
The mechanical version does have the draw backs of coming up with a reliable way of doing it
I'm looking at going to 3 wheel brushless in the future with MBX, but I'll be looking towards a wobbly wheel setup like Y-Pout has. The reason I want to use a mechanical method for the translation is that with the pulse based electrical method of turning the motor off to translate, your reducing the motors duty cycle and degrading the power you get from the motors. I want to run a solution where the motor run at full speed all the time to provide the maximum power and torque. Also, the faster you go with the electronic method, the slower the translation speeds due to the smaller amount of time off time you can produce, the mechanical method should produce close to proportional faster translation as you increase the RPM.
The mechanical version does have the draw backs of coming up with a reliable way of doing it

Comment