I was discussing this with a few people at the championships after it was used to finalise one of the judges decisions after a close match - if a robot were to use translational drift (melty brain spinners) or gyroscopic forces (Tip-Top from Robot Wars) to move across the arena floor, since I'm assuming you wouldn't be able to use your weaponry to move and with it being integral to movement, would this be classed as an automatic failure of the demonstration, even if your robot was in perfect working condition? Likewise if you were just a terrible driver and literally couldn't do a decent figure 8 even with a working machine (like myself) would that also be considered a fail if your machine was otherwise still in perfect working order? I do realise that the fight it was used to judge had 720 with only had one side of the drive operational, but it wasn't allowed to use the gyroscopic forces of the drum to drive like it had been in the fight - I know that counts for damage, but was more interested on what would happen if you only had one driven wheel anyway or something, like with Meltys or gyroscopic drives like Tip Top...
I don't wish to bring up any controversy or anything from the battle in question, just this was a thought I had when discussing it in the pits. I don't think the situation is particularly likely to arise any time soon (most of these methods of drive are quite niche and difficult to do as far as I'm aware, and it's rare that there's such a close match anyway) but I was just curious as to what the official stance was on it, should it ever occur.
I don't wish to bring up any controversy or anything from the battle in question, just this was a thought I had when discussing it in the pits. I don't think the situation is particularly likely to arise any time soon (most of these methods of drive are quite niche and difficult to do as far as I'm aware, and it's rare that there's such a close match anyway) but I was just curious as to what the official stance was on it, should it ever occur.
Comment