If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Please email info@fightingrobots.co.uk if you have any questions.
When hypnodisk shattered Stealth in series 3, the disk weapon was new technology
Antrax/Raven and Behemoth were among the first to use NiCd 7000 mAh cells. Equally new.
When Hardox was introduced in RW, it was new technology.
When Gravity started flipping in Heat D series 7, it was new technology and dangerous too boot.
When is something new technology? Or when is it just cunning use of existing possibilities?
The terrohurtz team are not changing anything but batteries.
And therefore will be weighing lighter than it usually does.
To keep bringing the integrity of this honorable team in to question is surprising to all who know them.
John is doing this testing on behalf of us all.
One of the main areas of benefit is going to be the featherweight folk.
Just to put things back into context.
Kan Opener squeezes you with battery power.
Both the above statements .....mine and Andys are really irrelevant to the original concern about weight.
All A123 battery testing Robots should.. IMO .. weigh in at the Championships UNDERWEIGHT by some 2 or 3 kgs ...thus proving that they have ONLY replaced their original batteries with a like for like Amp/Hr rating ....thus gaining NO appreciable power advantage and also showing that extras havent been added due to having a couple of extra kilos spare.
Alternatively ....If they really want to be top limit on weight ......A couple of housebricks tapped inside should be OK for ballast
Excuse me? The Aussies have been using A123 for well on to a year now. The first mentioning was in June 2006, and now more and more featherweight teams are using them over there.
And why is it that a LiPo is allowed in a Feather and an A123 isnt? I read this line the same as Woody did, anything heavier than a feather and Lithium rechargeable is not allowed. To me that says ALL Lithium, not just LiPo in particular.
It sounds a bit funky to me that a battery that is inherently unstable would be allowed while a cell that is mechanicly way more stable isnt.
I give you now outward point of view. If yuo robot is so bad that it can win because other robot have better batteries perhaps you should build better robot? If safety of this lithium cell is not a problem then it should be ok?
In end batterys are only small part of robot and that it win or not. My robot was only robot with lipo battery in 12kg em compatition. dit it win picause better batteries? - no it lose because I am bad driver!
But 270g 3S 3200mah lipo VS 650g 10cell a GP3300 and lipo is at lower price! I love Finland 3
I dont remember all this fuss when people started using NiCads, like everything else in this sport, somebody has to be first!!, so I say Good luck with the testing John.
Comment