Resignation from rep position
Shane, if you think the backroom is meant to just make wild accusations or blackening of the FRA, consider this:
When you asked a question on the FRA forum that the FRA did not seem fitting to ask on a PUBLIC forum your post got removed there. Had there been a backroom or similar setup on the FRA forum itself you would not have had that problem.
The whole backroom concept is a good one, but can be used for bad things when you are not carefull. On the other hand, would you rather have Daves message and Andys e-mail plastered over a PUBLIC forum for the world to read?
I can not for the life of me see why a tool that works so well on other forums would not work for the FRA. This implies a serious distrust between the members already making wild accusations as to its contents without even reading it. And its not that they cant read it, all it takes is 1 email.
And Stu, instead of flying of the handle like that to me on MSN, first get your facts straight.
I am a DRG and therefore by default also a FRA safety officer. I saw things that could not be fixed at the event but had to be addressed. I have used the FRA guidelines, filled in a FRA form and presented my findings to the FRA and Jonno, and I have been confirmed I had valid issues.
Just because you enjoyed the fights (as did I) it does not automatically make it a good event by all criterea. there where some things wrong, and I have been assured by Jonno these things will be delt with. That is all I want.
Why did I not send this to Stu privatly? well he blocked me on msn and there is no backroom. But he is accusing me of (REMOVED BANNED WORD) stirring, and I will not have my integrity questioned for doing my job.
(Message edited by kane on October 15, 2007)
Shane, if you think the backroom is meant to just make wild accusations or blackening of the FRA, consider this:
When you asked a question on the FRA forum that the FRA did not seem fitting to ask on a PUBLIC forum your post got removed there. Had there been a backroom or similar setup on the FRA forum itself you would not have had that problem.
The whole backroom concept is a good one, but can be used for bad things when you are not carefull. On the other hand, would you rather have Daves message and Andys e-mail plastered over a PUBLIC forum for the world to read?
I can not for the life of me see why a tool that works so well on other forums would not work for the FRA. This implies a serious distrust between the members already making wild accusations as to its contents without even reading it. And its not that they cant read it, all it takes is 1 email.
And Stu, instead of flying of the handle like that to me on MSN, first get your facts straight.
I am a DRG and therefore by default also a FRA safety officer. I saw things that could not be fixed at the event but had to be addressed. I have used the FRA guidelines, filled in a FRA form and presented my findings to the FRA and Jonno, and I have been confirmed I had valid issues.
Just because you enjoyed the fights (as did I) it does not automatically make it a good event by all criterea. there where some things wrong, and I have been assured by Jonno these things will be delt with. That is all I want.
Why did I not send this to Stu privatly? well he blocked me on msn and there is no backroom. But he is accusing me of (REMOVED BANNED WORD) stirring, and I will not have my integrity questioned for doing my job.
(Message edited by kane on October 15, 2007)
Comment