If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Please email info@fightingrobots.co.uk if you have any questions.
Unfortunately the RFL gets its share of the Vocal minority. There are 4 or 5 people who are complaining about possible changes and a majority that will work with any rules if it will help the sport!
I personally dont care one way or the other I build for events I plan to attend I built the new Sewer Snake for a UK event 2 yrs. ago It would have been an untested bot at the Phantom Event World Champ. and was changed for longer fights, and the possible need for a removable link. But now Its ready to retire, and Id like to get to play there before I rebuild again!
Just skimmed through the first hundred posts and it appears that there are three main opposers to the unification concept. The vast majority seem to support the idea and simply want to get on with it.
I wont write off all Americans because of the views of the few.
The most of the americans fortunately have the same attitude towards the rule change as us. If it helps our sport forward, fine, implement them asap and lets get on with it.
Well they were the first to start a 2.4Ghz craze and its relatively easy to borrow a different tx/rx combo for an event if need be, so as long as you dont start transmitting on an illegal frequency in another country Im sure youd be OK!
we were allowed to use 40 meg in the states although I am not saying that that will be true of every trip. It did however make getting the transmitter out far easier
2.4 gigs is legal both here and in the US. It would be interesting to hear what those who operated 2.4 gigahertz at the UK Champs have to say about it. The one machine I saw operating with it had no problems. Also 27 megahertz is legal both here and in the US.
John you should take alook at the 2.4Ghz radio control thread in the Safety Discussions section, reports and comments are just starting to come through.
Many Eruo freqs are illegal, depending on how you read the laws (or not, depending on how you read them.)
Im not the FCC, and my concern is with two Txs on the same freq, not what freq that is. If the FCC comes down on us and has an officer there, they can enforce it. Its not our job to worry about a micro-watt transmitter operating on a freq that no one outside our event is using. Its not like your interfearing with air traffic control...
If a bunch of guys come over with 40 MHz Txs, my greatest concern would be making more clips for the respectvie freqs. (we do run tight freq control as to if your Tx is on when that particular channel hasnt been checked out - thats a safety issue, nothing more.)
The 2.4 operating frequency will be discussed at the next FRA meeting. There are potential safety issues to be worked out. ( These do not concern the frequency its self at the moment )
At the UK champs 2.4 users were allowed to keep their transmitters as there was only a few of them. A robot did have an out of control problem when useing 2.4. This is being investigated as to the cause.
Regarding weights etc, the FRA have had no proposals from the RFL to discuss.
We have offered the RFL a meeting to chew over things but so far have not replied to our mail.
Comment