If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Please email info@fightingrobots.co.uk if you have any questions.
On more detailed inspection it seems we have our problem. The main back plate at the base was welded a good 5 degrees away from where is should be and as a result that has moved all the other plates out of alignment. If we can get them to re do the back then everything should drop into place as it was designed to.
So, assuming you can simply grind off the welds to do it again...
Remove the 9 back plates by grinding them off then swap the two bent plates over so they are on the other side and as a result bowing out not in, adjust the angle of the central plate and re-weld.
Conker II is now beginning to look like a robot and not just a bunch of parts. Uprights are in and fitting nicely, motors are on and its got enough structure for me to be able to lay out the other parts in their final positions; see http://teameventorizon.imgur.com/all/.
There are also some comparison pictures of Conkers 1 & 2. Conker II is 80mm narrower than the original in its main structure but will actually be 100mm wider when the armour panels are on.
Binky has gone back to be re-welded free of charge but it doesn't solve the design flaw inherent in the design which is entirely down to me. The armour and base don't overlap and as a result the robot doesn't hug the ground like it should leaving it with a lip on all edges. We have several solutions for this but no idea which will work.
PJ-27: Yep, its Garys bulkheads and disc. So that will give you an idea of the type of machine it is meant to be.
When it comes to the armour, the gap was massive at the back, a good centimeter, so it needed redoing anyway. You could easily have got a spike or thin sheet of metal in that would take out the lipo's. When you pushed the back down the front came up by two inch's.
Conker II is built in virtually the same way as the original, but with some material changes and design tweaks. I have also raised the disc up so it doesn't catch on the ground like last time :-P
Archie2000: I thought that as well but given it was going to be my dads machine he got to make most of the choices. He didn't like the idea of a push bot like 540; thought it was dull, thought drum bots were not dangerous enough; I think that 540s replacement is going to make him change his mind. The list goes on. So we ended up with another spinner.
Conker has got the ability to take the disc out by removing 12 bolts, the idea being I could design a Biohazard style lifter to go in there instead or an axe or a crusher. So its not a one trick robot.
My only worry would be if we got drawn against eachnother at any point. Binky at full speed, in theory, can cut through hardox.
A new endeavor! As some of you may know, to push robotics and engineering in my university I started a robotics society.
We are currently building antweights for a internal competition and then perhaps having the chance of going against Reading uni and their antweights.
Here are the first parts of my ant; as yet unnamed.
[attachment=0:84bzdnac]20121026_193726.png[/attachment:84bzdnac]
Motors are 100:1 Mini Metal Gearmotors from Sparkfun with 42x19mm Pololu wheels.
ESC is a Sabertooth Dual 5A and the receiver is a Orange 6Ch RX.
I am going to have the chassis 3D printed at uni in ABS. We may have access to a titanium printer but it probably wouldn't be free and I am not sure if it would actually be as strong as the ABS.
Comment